“You have to do it in a way that does not create uncomfortable or discriminatory feelings on the part of other students.”
but it is ok for us to be uncomfortable about about homersexuals.
The gay agenda in regard to promulgating its views in the name of education is abominable. Maybe I am too old fashioned, but aren’t there more important things to learn (like reading and writing and math and science) than gaiety 101? The gay activist agenda claims loudly and proudly that they were born gay with large credence given to genetics. Now, I think differently. Thee are too many variables and levels for homosexuality to be purely a result of genetics. I am not saying genetics doesn’t play a part, but I don’t believe that there is a gay gene. I think sexuality has a habitual component to it as well. Maybe the word I am looking for is something in the ballpark of societal reinforcement. Once that societal reinforcement is watered down, there is a chance that the subject has a larger possibility of being attracted to the same sex. I think this is more so with males than females. Gay activists know this but will never admit it. You create an atmosphere in the schools where there is no gender reinforcement and the greater fluidity in who one is possibly attracted to, and the gay lobby are very happy campers. Gay activists better pray there is no gay gene because I wonder how many would opt for abortion if they knew their kid was gay or lesbian (I am in no way advocating this, just speaking hypothetically)