Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee; redgolum
However, I have NEVER UNDERSTOOD why they resist the truth of the Real Presence

I didn't either, but one of my (sorry) Protestant friends, the wife of a youth minister at a congregation designated "Community Church," told me that it's an issue not so much with the Real Presence, but the fact that it requires a priest to consecrate the Eucharist.

In other words, if you have the Body of Christ, you must have a priest to consecrate it. Then you need a Bishop to ordain the priest. Then you need an organization to appoint and ordain the Bishop. And before you know it, you've got a whole ecclesiastical structure (like the Catholic Church, for example :-), which some (sorry) Protestants, in the (sorry) Puritan/Congregationalist tradition, reject as "unBiblical."

As you said about some other beliefs, wagglebee, I don't agree with this position, but it makes a reasonable amount of sense, when considered with its particular historical context.

93 posted on 03/15/2007 6:22:27 AM PDT by Tax-chick (John Edwards is a gamma male. "Yeah, buddy, that's his own hair!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick; redgolum

That still doesn't make sense. They had no problem saying that their ordained ministers can baptize, marry, etc. Most of them still have a form of communion. So, it seems that they still could have retained it, as Lutherans have (I won't even try to get into Lutherans' belief of Consubstantiation vs. Catholic/Orthodox Transubstantiation, because it confuses me).


94 posted on 03/15/2007 6:32:01 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson