Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: MarkBsnr; Uncle Chip
Praying is a Judeo-Christian practice

As Uncle Chip phrases it, the issue is not practice, but origin. Uncle Chip's argument seems to be that because other religions performed ceremonial lustrations before Christians did, therefore the origin sort of has more corrupting mojo, which overpowers the feeble Holy Spirit's (as THEY, not I, seem to say) efforts to redeem.

Then if we were able to find evidence of prayer on the part of people outside the Judeo-Christian tradition would that show that prayer was somehow wrong for us because it was of pagan origin? Well, prayer is mentioned in the Bible, so presumably that certifies that in that case the Holy Spirit is able to handle its use by pagans.

However the Bible has numerous references to water sprinkled with hyssop as a ritual or cultic cleansing rather than merely a practical or sanitary cleansing -- though the distinction back then was not as bold and clear as it is now.

Nevertheless, the use of water for cultic lustration in the Bible does NOT, ah, purge away it's pagan origin, while the use of prayer in the Bible does purge away its cultic origin.

So what other objective difference can we find? Well, the obvious one is that these days the most frequent cultic use of water for ceremonial cleansing is in the Catholic Church. That seems to be the principle and operative difference between lustration and prayer. Both were done first by pagans. Both are in the Bible. But one is not done by Protestants.

So the argument comes down to "Catholics are wrong because they use practices used by Catholics, who, as we all know, are wrong."

Circle the arguments, uh, I mean, wagons!

2,304 posted on 03/29/2007 3:46:33 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Tactical shotty, Marlin 1894c, S&W 686P, Sig 226 & 239, Beretta 92fs & 8357, Glock 22, & attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2298 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg; Uncle Chip

You must remember, sir, that Uncle Chip has an extremely abridged Bible. It is beyond his acceptance that we use the portions of the Bible that he doesn't use.

Also remember that he rejects Jesus' divine nature whilst on Earth. He has not yet replied to my direct questions, but from what I gather, he believes that Jesus was only human on earth, but has been resurrected into a god-like state. As will be all those who are resurrected. Sounds like LDS beliefs to me.

But he has not referred to the Book of Mormon yet. I'm still trying to understand what he believes Sacred Scripture to be. And what it's composed of.


2,308 posted on 03/29/2007 4:11:44 AM PDT by MarkBsnr (When you believe in nothing, then everything is acceptable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2304 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Dawg
However the Bible has numerous references to water sprinkled with hyssop as a ritual or cultic cleansing

Is the water sprinkled with the hyssop or is the blood or blood diluted with water sprinkled with the hyssop?

2,309 posted on 03/29/2007 4:15:41 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson