Collections
The oldest collection of the writings of St. Ignatius known to have existed was that made use of by the historian Eusebius in the first half of the fourth century, but which unfortunately is no longer extant. It was made up of the seven letters written by Ignatius whilst on his way to Rome; These letters were addressed to the Christians
...
We find these seven mentioned not only by Eusebius ("Hist. eccl.", III, xxxvi) but also by St. Jerome (De viris illust., c. xvi). Of later collections of Ignatian letters which have been preserved, the oldest is known as the "long recension". This collection, the author of which is unknown, dates from the latter part of the fourth century. It contains the seven genuine and six spurious letters, but even the genuine epistles were greatly interpolated to lend weight to the personal views of its author. For this reason they are incapable of bearing witness to the original form. The spurious letters in this recension are those that purport to be from Ignatius
...
It is extremely probable that the interpolation of the genuine, the addition of the spurious letters, and the union of both in the long recension was the work of an Apollonarist of Syria or Egypt, who wrote towards the beginning of the fifth century. Funk identifies him with the compiler of the Apostolic Constitutions, which came out of Syria in the early part of the same century. Subsequently there was added to this collection a panegyric on St. Ignatius entitled, "Laus Heronis". Though in the original it was probably written in Greek, it is now extant only in Latin and Coptic texts. There is also a third recension, designated by Funk as the "mixed collection". The time of its origin can be only vaguely determined as being between that of the collection known to Eusebius and the long recension. Besides the seven genuine letters of Ignatius in their original form, it also contains the six spurious ones, with the exception of that to the Philippians.
Catholic Encyclopedia - Ignatius Of Antioch
Please note:
The first mention of the letters was made by Eusebius but they don't exist. Hmmmmmmmmmm!
Of the copies (known forgeries and ??? maybe authentic which do exist there is both a long and a short recension. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm At least one of these copies must be fraudulent.
Finally we have the standard "smoke" language.
Thanks. What a mess!
This is incredible. These letters are always brought up by Catholics as being evidence of their faith in their Church and yet these are admittedly spurious and corrupted.
On another website I read that there is a discrepancy between the Latin version of Ecclesiastical History and the Eusebius' original written in Greek, and that Jerome, who translated it from Greek to Latin, made certain additions when he did so. It makes one wonder about a lot of those oft-cited quotations attributed to the early Church fathers and how many are really the words of their translators?