Replies

Dear P-Marlowe,

I didn't say that ASKING the question was anti-Catholic bigotry.

Rather, I said that interpreting it as a "no" is.

Especially if the interviewer made no effort to clarify meaning.

When I interview, I often ask questions where I'm looking for specific answers. If I don't initially get them, I try to clarify what answers I DO get, to see if they wind up where I'd like them to be.

"Now he has responded with a most-unChristian discrimination lawsuit,..."

Oh, I don't know if I'd call it "un-Christian."

Just unfounded.

sitetest

This is the way he should have handled it:

Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints? Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.

I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren? But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers.

Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong? why do ye not rather [suffer yourselves to] be defrauded? Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that [your] brethren. - I Cor 6:1-8

You do not know if you would call it unChristian to sue?
Then you ought to do a bit of research in the Bible.
People who respond "Yes, I am a Christian" would understand the contention that the use of a secular court is not right.