[Gengis Khan]

"Hinduism, by way of contrast, has far more intellectual and moral content than this ginned-up neo-apollo-puppy trend. But I'm sure you knew that."

Hinduism has far more intellectual and moral content than even Christianity but thats no basis for me to oppose Christianity.

[Gengis Khan]

Except perhaps Islam, I am not against any religion (that includes Mormons, Pagans, Seculars, Agnostics and Atheists) doesn't matter how or why. I am only against perverts that promote proselytization or holy war. I believe THOSE ideas are based upon erroneous religious beliefs and teachings.

To me it seems that these "ginned-up neo-apollo-puppy" are choosing/practicing their faith out of their own volition. I see no reason why I should oppose them based on the reasons you have stated. Doesn't this in your book go against the tenet of "freedom of religion" or for you is it only "freedom of the Christian religion" that you are concerned about?

I don't quite understand the logic that religion X should be given no space because its morally or spiritually incapable of resisting religion Y.

[Mrs. Don-o]

You're a gentleman, Gengis.

BTW, it's good to see you back on the forum.