Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger
Didn't say that it was. Said neither of us can be absolutely dogmatic.

Oh, there I agree. My opinion on its own means nothing.

172 posted on 01/31/2007 11:28:12 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]


To: Claud

Nor does mine. Which is why I try to back up what I am saying with Scripture. Some Scripture portions are hard do deal with. But, you deal with them nevertheless because it is what Scripture says. The idea of a virgin birth, for example, is something some people have a hard time with. I don't. I accept it by faith with no difficulty in the least because the Scripture testifies of such and the evidence is that in spite of efforts to try no real credible evidence exists to suggest something else. In other areas, such as the one we are dealing with, we should draw our conclusion from Scripture. If there is a difference of interpretation, I differ to the on non-essentials liberty saying. I believe the primacy of Peter to be false, but I don't lose sleep over it and recognize that others believe differently.


213 posted on 01/31/2007 7:22:34 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson