[Running On Empty]

This is the second time I am writing re: a post you once wrote in which you claimed you “were not anti-Catholic”.

I replied to that post by saying that you could have fooled me.

By their posts you shall know them.

Again, in reading on this thread, I will say: you could have fooled me when you wrote that you weren’t anti-Catholic.

If you are not, your posts do not present that convincingly.

Either you are, are you aren’t anti-Catholic.

[wmfights]

Either you are, are you aren’t anti-Catholic.

How do you define this?

[Dr. Eckleburg]

ROE, I am not anti-members of the Roman Catholic Church, many whom I count among my family and friends.

I do disagree whole-heartedly with much the RCC teaches. I think it is anti-Scriptural and anti-grace.

I believe, however, that there are saved Christians among the RCC. And yet the RCC does not give me that same benefit of the doubt since it believes there is no salvation outside the confines of the church in Rome.

So who really has the narrower definition of Christian?