Whether the post was long or short did we or did we not have a long conversation concerning the doctrine of election in which you said my view made God "cruel and capricious"? If my Scriptural case did not convince you then, it will not convince you now.
That's very true. And if your waking consciousness didn't convince that you have free will then, it won't convince you now.
I can't imagine someone arguing that we don't have free will. If we don't what's the point of arguing about it?
Or is it that you can't choose not to argue about it?
The position just gets absurd fast.