[Wonder Warthog]

"I'll have to reread my copy of the New Testament. I missed the part where Mary describes the condition of her vagina after Jesus was born."

And there is your disconnect. You've bought completely into "sola scriptura", which does NOT have "the whole story", and is, in fact, itself un-Biblical. Try actually reading what the Catholic Church has to say on the subject with an open mind. You might just be surprised as to how logical (and how backed by scripture) the Church's positions on Mary are.

[Lurker]

You've bought completely into "sola scriptura", which does NOT have "the whole story", and is, in fact, itself un-Biblical.

So the Bible is un-Biblical.

Right. Got it.

Try actually reading what the Catholic Church has to say on the subject with an open mind.

My mind is pretty open. But it's not so open that I'll believe what some guy who was born 400 hundred years after Mary died says about her vagina.

You might just be surprised as to how logical (and how backed by scripture)

Logic tells me that since no one who was there at the time wrote about her vaginal condition we have no evidence one way or the other. And didn't you just tell me that what I was looking for wasn't in Scripture?

L