That is only because you insist on taking the word 'assume' in a way that kosta is not using it.
-A8
The word "assume" carries with it the connotation of "not really". He did not simply "assume" flesh (as he did in the Theophanies), he became flesh (a permanent condition).
He was and is and evermore shall be "flesh". If he were not "flesh" he could not have died and then be resurrected. Flesh is not something he merely "put on" like a costume, it is something he became.
kostas statement that: "God the Word has no flesh, no form, nor shape, no humanity" connots that "God the word" is not flesh, that G"od the Word" has no shape and He has no humanity," i.e., he has shed his fleshly "costume."
Kosta's statement is in the present tense, which means that as we speak "God the Word has no flesh, no form, nor shape, no humanity." In other words "he is not risen, he has returned to normal."
Do you agree with that?
I am not Kosta's mind reader. Kosta can explain what Kosta means.