[spunkets]

' Do you see how pointless this is?"

I never said, or say "that's just your interpretation. I presented the facts in a logical fashion and showed how only one true conclusion could be drawn from them. This case was easy. Once that's done in a complete fashion, there's no point in going beyond that.

"Of course annalex could say the same thing to you, replacing the word "Catholic" with the word "spunkets's", and then, once again, the two of you would be even."

I didn't make the comment to annalex. Both of us presented facts and what we thought the conclusion warranted by the facts was. That is rational discouse. I made the remark to the comment, "that's your opinion", which when is repeatedly made, is not rational discourse.

[adiaireton8]

I presented the facts in a logical fashion and showed how only one true conclusion could be drawn from them.

In your opinion, only one true conclusion can be drawn. But in annalex's opinion, another true conclusion can be drawn. Who is to say?

-A8