[spunkets]

" That's just your interpretation."

I don't interpret plain language. It means she was a virgin and the angel told her she would be with child before they were married! So the response in no way whatsoever means she was indicating she would always be a virgin.

[adiaireton8]

I don't interpret plain language.

It is your intepretation that the language in question is plain language.

It means she was a virgin and the angel told her she would be with child before they were married!

It is your interpretation that it means only that. It is annalex's interpretation that it means more than that.

So the response in no way whatsoever means she was indicating she would always be a virgin.

That's your interpretation.

-A8

[annalex]

and the angel told her she would be with child before they were married!

No, her didn't. Show me. It is a plain scriptural question.