They sure can be.
<>"B) Who's talking about causes? I'm asking why you choose to make your decisions based on enjoyment."
I didn't say I based them on enjoyment. I said I get up, because I value life and that a sufficient reason for that is, becuase I enjoy it.
"What is the logic behind living for enjoyment?"
Logic is a process, not a philosophy.
"If it feels good, do it? You know this is not logic."
Apparently you didn't comprehend my last post.
Re: Everything can be known by observation and reason.
" Except perhaps why you got out of be this morning?"
You just don't like my answer.
"What's the real reason - or is it that underneath all the reasoning, there is something else?"
There is nothing else that isn't encompassed by love of life.
"A) Activated pleasure centers do not a logical motivator make."Congratulations, you have made it to the level of Crustacea.
They sure can be.
I said I get up, because I value life…
And I asked in Q6: Why is life better than no life?
Do you assume this, accept it based on authority, accept it without examination or do you have reason/logic for it.
Please remember your initial assertion: You base all you choices and decisions solely on logic/reason - especially the important ones. What is the logic that supports this one?
Logic is a process, not a philosophy.
Your stated philososophy (above) is called rationalism. We're demonstrating that you cannot, or thus far will not, apply it to your life.