Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Buggman; spunkets; Blogger; xzins; blue-duncan; Dr. Eckleburg
My roomate, who isn't even a believer, says he thinks that's covered in John 1:1 or something like that. Anyone care to look it up to check?

At any rate here is the definitive verse from the mouth of our Lord:

(John 8:58 KJV) Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

It is simply amazing the kind of weird stuff people will believe when they abandon scripture in favor of tradition.

I have never heard this teaching before spunkets posted these little comments: "God would not be a trinity, unless He was born of woman."... "In order for God to be a trinity, the man part must exist."

That is some weird stuff. Is this some kind of Catholic Catechism? Or is this new to everyone else too?

2,362 posted on 12/19/2006 11:32:25 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2360 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe; Salvation; NYer; adiaireton8; Kolokotronis; spunkets; Blogger; xzins; blue-duncan; ...
"God would not be a trinity, unless He was born of woman."... "In order for God to be a trinity, the man part must exist."

This gets ranked with the immaculate hymen as something entirely new to me. I had no idea that this would be RC teaching.

I've pinged some other RC's (and one Ortho) to see if they believe this.

Personally, I don't think Spunkets is right about RC teaching.

2,386 posted on 12/20/2006 4:44:21 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2362 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson