Are you saying that 2000 years worth of holy men are wrong and YOU are right?
= = =
It’s better when you don’t put words in my fingers.
Yeah, 1600 years of some traditions of men are less right than my convictions about some Spiritual things.
Doesn’t mean I consider myself infallible at all.
Seems like there are a LOT of “EITHER/OR” handicapped folks on our forum. LOL.
It's better if you answer my question rather than claiming that I am making a statement which I certainly did not write! I ASKED you if you were infallible, I didn't say YOU said you were infallible, nor did I say you were infallible. I was asking for clarification.
Yeah, 1600 years of some traditions of men are less right than my convictions about some Spiritual things.
Based on your say-so? Based on what evidence? That you are less fallible??? You have not said anything essentially different from what I have previously stated on my theory - that Protestants have this uncanny "knowledge" that they are right and those who disagree are wrong. Not only are they so sure of this conviction, they are INFALLIBLY so. Without possibility of being wrong. Only someone who thought that way could make such statements as "1600 years of some traditions of men are less right than my convictions about some Spiritual things".
I don't care who you are, that's funny.