Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration; Uncle Chip
Thank you for the link. I am not sure who Ruslan Khazarzar is. I would also like to see a source written by someone other than a Protestant.

As for the comment that the Alexandrian text is "compromised" with Byzantine variations, the same can be said of the whole Codex Alexandrinus.

Despite your claim that I am behind on this issue, there is a surprising lack of balanced (non-biased, non-Protestant) scholary agreement on the "theory" that the older Alexandrian-type text is somewhow "junk" and the Byzantine-type is the one and true version, or that the KJV is the Bible. The KJV is anything but that.

11,205 posted on 03/02/2007 6:14:24 AM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11201 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50
Thank you for the link. I am not sure who Ruslan Khazarzar is. I would also like to see a source written by someone other than a Protestant.

The fact is that some 544 changes were made back to the TR from the WH readings in the 26th edition in the NA.

Being a 'Protestant' doesn't change those facts.

11,253 posted on 03/06/2007 5:16:46 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (For what saith the scripture? (Rom.4:3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson