Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Forest Keeper; wagglebee; wmfights; xzins; kosta50; Kolokotronis; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; ...
in such cases as the Marian doctrines, in which case we assert that there is a direct contradiction in scripture.

There is a contradiction with a particular interrpetation of the Bible, the one you happen to favor, not with the Bible itself.

1,119 posted on 12/11/2006 7:42:53 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies ]


To: annalex; Forest Keeper; Gamecock; Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan; Frumanchu

If interpretation is the issue, then you have agreed that we are a differing hermeneutic than what you use.

We are making progress.

We rely on scripture foremost, and then, history, reason, and experience.

You rely on scripture and tradition. My sense is that the tradition relied upon is carefully selected. I would claim that the dogma preceded the study rather than vice versa.

Such an eisegetical method is backward to those who advocate sola scriptura.


1,120 posted on 12/11/2006 7:54:30 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson