[Running On Empty]

I've just been an observer, and am not speaking for Adiareton8--only for myself. It may be that he has chosen the better part and it won't be taken away from him.

His questioners have acted more like provocateurs than ones who would say "Come, let us reason together".

He has, as IQ reminded you in a post above, told you how he wanted to participate in this "discussion".

ROE

[Running On Empty]

I'm sorry--I should have said "some of his questioners" and not make it seem as if it were all.

[wmfights]

"I've just been an observer,..."
_______________________________

If you have been an impartial observer, you would admit that UC and D have presented a very compelling argument that Peter was not in Rome as claimed. The response when confronted with this argument has been silence.

Instead of attacking the posters who presented this argument so well, why not support your argument that Peter was in Rome and was the founder and Bishop of that church?
Is it that you have no reliable information to draw on? If not why not present it?