Replies

To: InterestedQuestioner

Need I remind you of the topic of our thesis:

THE EVIDENCE for THE TWENTY-FIVE YEAR BISHOPRIC of SAINT PETER in ROME and His UPSIDEDOWN CRUCIFIXION under NERO

Part 1] Evidence From the Holy Scriptures: There is no evidence at all.

Part 2] Evidence From the Writings of the Ante-Nicene Fathers: (coming soon from Adiaireton8 or InterestedQuestioner)

Your magisterium doesn't just claim that Peter was in Rome, they claim that he took up residence there as a bishop. Now post the evidence of such from the sacred words of the Ante-Nicene Fathers so that we can finish Part 2 and move on to the next step of our studies.

1,752 posted on 10/27/2006 4:55:45 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (Wise as a serpent, but harmless as a cardinal in . . . . October)

Uncle Chip,

So you concede you have no evidence that St. Peter was never in Rome? Are you also conceding that the historical record is unanimous in placing St. Peter in Rome?

1,756 posted on 10/27/2006 5:01:26 PM PDT by InterestedQuestioner (Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you and your household will be saved.)

move on to the next step of our studies

I like to read up ahead of time, so what do you reckon this might be?

1,757 posted on 10/27/2006 5:08:27 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (why is it so difficult to understand)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794