[InterestedQuestioner]

Uncle Chip,

I'll take this as your concession that you have no evidence to support your assertion that Peter was never in Rome. That is to say, you have neither Scripture nor historical evidence to support your claim.

You're argument runs contrary to all historical evidence, and it's based upon a logical fallacy.

The historical record is unanimous. The Apostle Peter was in fact in Rome, and he died there.

[Uncle Chip]

I'll take this as your concession that you have no evidence to support your assertion that Peter was never in Rome. That is to say, you have neither Scripture nor historical evidence to support your claim.

Come on, Adiaireton8, send us your Part 2. I did my part, now you need to do yours. Quit sandbagging and stalling and send us those sacred words of the Holy Fathers. We'll be careful with them. Come on, Adaire