To: Diego1618
"What I have posted here is Biblical.....not tradition..."
______________________________
Thank you, that's a pretty convincing argument. If Peter wasn't there and didn't start the Roman Church, why the myth. What benefit was it to the RCC to have Peter rather than Paul the Apostle that started their church?
I know it's a tough question. I've been trying to figure out when the Eucharist changed from being symbolic to transmuted substances and haven't found the answer for that.
1,625 posted on
10/26/2006 4:36:55 PM PDT by
wmfights
(Psalm : 27)
To: wmfights
What benefit was it to the RCC to have Peter rather than Paul the Apostle that started their church?When our Lord was speaking to Paul [Acts 9:3-9] he never mentioned the word "rock".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson