These are not worldviews, since a worldview is a *comprehensive* view of the world, and these are very limited and specific claims.
= = = =
Methinks that A-G is not well known or her words are not well comprehended by that perspective. She chooses her words well. They are accurate. Whether individual readers recognize that, or not . . . is a different issue.
Indeed, I meant to use the word "worldview". A worldview is ego-centric, it's the perspective from which one interprets the world he perceives.
If a person's worldview is that "the absence of evidence is evidence of absence" he'll interpret the world quite differently than one whose worldview allows for gaps to be filled in by "just so" stories.