Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: adiaireton8; Quix

Mysticism is a personal revelation, and there really is no way of knowing the source. It can be just vain imaginings or revelation from spirits not from God.(Acts 16:16) You chastised Quix in a previous post about each person interpreting scripture and getting 2000 sects. Well here is the same thing, and no benefit of even reading the scripture. With personal revelation there is the chance of great error as the HS is not the author. To rely on these revelations as doctrine is foolishness.


1,425 posted on 10/25/2006 1:59:11 PM PDT by 1000 silverlings (why is it so difficult to understand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1422 | View Replies ]


To: 1000 silverlings
Thanks. Now I understand your concern. As you noted, I completely agree with you that mysticism divorced from Church authority is a recipe for "each person doing what is right in his own eyes", and a fragmentation of the Church into as many 'churches' as there are believers. I couldn't agree with you more on that point.

But, if a person is under the authority of the Church, then I think your concern would be allayed. The Church's mystics, think of St. John of the Cross, for example, or St. Teresa of Avila, have deeply enriched her theology and spirituality. Would you agree?

-A8

1,427 posted on 10/25/2006 2:07:56 PM PDT by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1425 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson