My background is old school Jesuit back so long ago that the Jebbies were still Catholic, still God's Marines and still practitioners of their Fourth Vow of fealty to the pope.
So they posted an article from Archbishop Lefebvre. I could post an article from Archbishop Hunthausen. So what? Comments made by leaders who are so far gone from the Church are meaningless to me.
To me, there's no difference between Hunthausen and Lefebvre......except that Hunthausen was never excommunicated. And he wasn't so vocal in his hatred for John Paul the Great.
On its face, #169 is worthy of condemnation.
On the other hand, my issue with you and BAC is your bully tactics. Your conduct has made it very clear that anyone who disagrees with you must be a closet SSPXer. Why must I prove TO YOU that I am not? Who made you the arbiter of who is Catholic on this forum? Why do honest Catholic like myself, narses, and TradicalRC have to be subject to your scrutiny when we fail to carry your water?
As for my #163, I'm sorry if you took it the wrong way. You and bornacatholic scratch each other's back so much that someone had to make a joke of it.
You and bornacatholic fancy yourself as "defenders of the Catholic Church and of Pope John Paul the Great" (or however you want to phrase it). I can tell you that in the process of acting as "defenders," you have stepped on a lot of toes unnecessarily. It is definitely not appreciated by many. I'm not the only one who has been critical of it.
As for your post #191, if criticizing your tactics is "preaching," then your going to have more "preaching," as long as you continue to use them.