Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: marshmallow
"I see nothing here which could be construed as meaning that Latin is to be dispensed with entirely."

Well, it obviously was, and the Bishops obviously "signed off" on agreeing that it should be, as I'm sure that the "Novus Ordo" went through all the relevant review procedures.

254 posted on 10/12/2006 12:48:26 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
Well, it obviously was, and the Bishops obviously "signed off" on agreeing that it should be, as I'm sure that the "Novus Ordo" went through all the relevant review procedures.

Church historians will eventually detail just exactly what "review procedures", or lack thereof the Novus Ordo went through. The story of how it was concocted and implemented does and will make fascinating reading.

However, to return to my basic point. This was not mandated by Vatican II.

The documents of this council nowhere support the assertion that Latin is no longer to be the liturgical language of the Church.

255 posted on 10/12/2006 1:01:40 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson