Given the REAL past history of the early Church, that makes more sense than trying to regress back to "universal Latin".
"Latin persists because it is pretty close to the languages spoken in (up to recently) 100% Catholic nations. English was only spoken by a little island way up past France."
That was then. Now, English is the most widely spoken language on the planet.
"I frankly thing English changes too quickly to be suitable."
A reasonable argument.
"Way back when, Latin was standardized in written and spoken forms. A written standard for any other language was unheard of until the recent epoch. Latin changed little through the middle ages, probably changed the most during recent times, but remains understandable from 200AD to 2007AD."
And that is a good argument for keeping it as the standard language of the heirarchy---NOT the mass.
"Sure its another language, thats why the Church allows vernacular Mass"
And I've got no problem with having BOTH.
Given the REAL past history of the early Church, that makes more sense than trying to regress back to "universal Latin".
Sounds more like a condemned error.
"If anyone says that the Mass should be celebrated in the vernacular only, let him be Anathema ." - Council of Trent (Session XXII, Canon 9)
WRONG, friend. Spanish is the most spoken language on the planet.