Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Warrior of Justice
The flaws in carbon dating. A hard fast constant method? uhm no. Might the flaws in the results expose the weakness in the underlying theory?? uhm yes.

"It may come as a shock to some, but fewer than 50 percent of the radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples in northeastern North America have been adopted as `acceptable' by investigators."—*J. Ogden III, "The Use and Abuse of Radiocarbon," in Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 288, 1977, pp. 167-173.
snip
"C-14 dating was being discussed at a symposium on the prehistory of the Nile Valley. A famous American colleague, Professor Brew, briefly summarized a common attitude among archaeologists towards it, as follows: If a C-14 date supports our theories, we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put it in a footnote. And if it is completely out of date we just drop it.

745 posted on 09/20/2006 6:32:01 PM PDT by RunningWolf (2-1 Cav 1975)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 734 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson