I beg to differ. One of the standard creationist bullet points is that science is merely another sort of religion. By declaring that methodological naturalism - the foundation of science itself - is to be treated as a theological belief, you are effectively declaring that the official position of FR is that the creationists are correct in this assertion, that science is in fact merely another sort of religion. However, having given away the farm, you will generously permit the debate - what's left of it, anyway - to continue.
No thanks.