Well then, are you going to withdraw your "You illustrate my point! LOLOL!" posts?
Post 1875 is a mindless knee-jerk reaction to 1873. Moreover, it is a non-responsive false dichotomy. Post 1873 holds up a mirror (pot-kettle-black) to your statement at 1872
And the chuckles at 1891 are not diminished for you offered two completely unrelated Freepers at 1884 who happen to have handles which are the very pejoratives used on the other website which I wrongly assumed were meant for betty boop and me. The Blavatsky twins pejorative was indeed meant for us .
But neither of the posters at 1884 replied on this thread, the second is banned. Thus reasoning (the missing and much sought-after trait in 1873) should have eliminated them entirely as candidate targets of the pejoratives, lapdog and nameless.
Thus my point was and is illustrated.
Moreover, ahayes, two wrongs not make a right. And that truism applies to this mindless, knee-jerk, back and forth - scriptable - parroting of talking points. It tars both sides, but more so the side which eschews altogether the concept of accepting anything by faith and further holds itself up to be the master of Aristotlean reasoning.
So again I challenge: