Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138; betty boop; cornelis
Sorry, but this is simply wrong in every possible way.

No, js1138. It is dead-on accurate.

Because Darwin's theory did not include a theory of abiogenesis, there is no inception - no bootstrap - to the evolutionary tree of life. But from the inception point forward, it is an unbroken continuum, a chain of common descent - life from life.

If he thought otherwise, the tree of life would look like a field of grass.

1,521 posted on 09/26/2006 3:31:16 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1520 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
No, js1138. It is dead-on accurate.

Ignoring, for the moment, what Darwin actually put down in writing, and substituting your fantasies.

1,522 posted on 09/26/2006 3:36:39 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1521 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson