Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianSchmoe
Thank you for your reply! But the parsing of the sentence is correct.

Darwin's theory which indeed does not address abiogenesis v. biogenesis, is a continuum (evolutionary tree of life) based on the presumption that "life comes from life" (omne vivum ex vivo) which also happens to be the law of Biogenesis.

1,519 posted on 09/26/2006 3:24:04 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1518 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl
Thanks right back atcha!

A description of a chain reaction is not an automatic implication that said reaction has always existed, or that some component of the reaction could only come from another component. Chain reactions can and do have a beginning; The ToE can and does explain the "speciation" reaction without addressing what started it.

1,547 posted on 09/27/2006 7:23:27 AM PDT by LibertarianSchmoe ("...yeah, but, that's different!" - mating call of the North American Ten-Toed Hypocrite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1519 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson