Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ahayes
Very well put. I'd offer some minor additions, if you'll let me. We understand that Pasteur's experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis of spontaneous generation. He concluded there was no spontaneity.

Have there been any experiments since then to make his observation obsolete?

1,461 posted on 09/25/2006 1:56:49 PM PDT by cornelis (La génération spontanée est une chimère. --Pasteur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1458 | View Replies ]


To: cornelis

"Spontaneous generation" as Pasteur defined it was known species (flies, mice, etc.) suddenly within a short time frame popping into existence on appropriate substrate. Some of Pasteur's original experimental apparatuses remain at the Pasteur Institute where they still have not spontaneously produced modern bacteria. I believe it is universally accepted that such a thing does not occur.

All of this says nothing about the possibility of abiogenesis as we would define it, being a completely different creature. Using Pasteur's experiments to forbid prebiotic evolution and abiogenesis would be like stubbornly continuing to be puzzled by the massive heat output of the sun--we now know that the heat is due to fusion, which no one before 1920 would have dreamed about.


1,467 posted on 09/25/2006 2:11:19 PM PDT by ahayes (My strength is as the strength of ten because my heart is pure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1461 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson