Of course, that's why the whole body of evidence must be considered together.
Science doesn't work in "proofs", in works with evidence to build working models - and that is exactly what evolution is. If enough evidence comes along that can't fit to the model's predictions, it's a sign something is wrong with the model - but that hasn't happened to evolution yet.
What would, in your mind, be convincing evidence that life evolved on earth? (With all due respect, I think there's a lot more evidence than you realize - a lot of it does take a while to learn to understand.)
Do you have any idea what is being argued in 1299?
I thought I did, but looking back I can't make any sense of it.