Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RunningWolf

For ages, scientists believed in a geocentric view of the universe. The differences between night and day were believed to be caused by the sun revolving around the earth.

Today, we know that the earth’s rotation on its axis is responsible for the sun’s rising and setting. But 4,000 or more years ago, it was written, “Have you commanded the morning since your days; and caused the day spring [dawn] to know his place? . . . It [the earth] is turned as clay to the seal” (Job 38:12,14). The picture here is of a clay vessel being turned or rotated upon the potter’s wheel—an accurate analogy of the earth’s rotation.

Luke 17:34–36 says the Second Coming of Jesus Christ will occur while some are asleep at night and others are working at daytime activities in the field. This is another clear indication of a revolving earth, with day and night occurring at the same time.

In speaking of the sun, the psalmist says that “his going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof” (Psalm 19:5,6).

For many years critics scoffed at these verses, thinking that the sun was stationary. Then it was discovered in recent years that the sun is in fact moving through space at
approximately 600,000 miles per hour.

It is traveling through the heavens and has a “circuit” just as the Bible says. Its circuit is so large that it would take approximately 200 million years to complete one orbit.

The Scriptures say, “Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them” (Genesis 2:1). The original Hebrew uses the past definite tense for the verb “finished,” indicating an action completed in
the past, never again to occur. The creation was “finished”—once and for all.

That is exactly what the First Law of Thermodynamics says. This law (often referred to as the Law of the Conservation of Energy and/or Mass) states that neither matter nor energy can be either created or destroyed. It was because of this Law that Sir Fred Hoyle’s “Steady-State” (or “Continuous Creation”) Theory was discarded. Hoyle stated that at points in the universe called “irtrons,” matter (or energy) was constantly being created.

But the First Law states just the opposite. Indeed, there is no “creation” ongoing today. It is “finished” exactly as the Bible states. Three places in the Bible (Isaiah 51:6; Psalm 102:25,26; Hebrews 1:11) indicate that the earth is wearing out. This is what the Second Law of Thermodynamics (Law of Increasing Entropy) states: in all physical processes, every ordered system over time tends to become more disordered.

Everything is running down and wearing out as energy is becoming less available for use. That means the universe will eventually “wear out” so that (theoretically speaking) there will be a “heat death” and therefore no more
energy available for use. This wasn’t discovered by man until fairly recently, but the Bible states it in clear, succinct terms.

God told Job in 1500 B.C.: “Can you send lightnings, that they may go, and say to you, Here we are?” (Job 38:35). The Bible here is making what appears to be a scientifically ludicrous statement—that light can be sent, and then manifest itself in speech. But did you know that radio waves travel at the speed of light? This is why you can have instantaneous wireless communication with someone on the other side of the earth. Science didn’t discover this until 1864 when “British scientist James Clerk Maxwell suggested that electricity and light waves were two forms of the same thing”

Job 38:19 asks, “Where is the way where light dwells?” Modern man has only recently discovered that light (electromagnetic radiation) has a “way,” traveling at 186,000 miles per second. Science has discovered that stars emit radio waves, which are received on earth as a high pitch. God mentioned this in Job 38:7: “When the morning stars sang together. . .”

With all these truths revealed in Scripture, how could a thinking person deny that the Bible is supernatural in origin? There is no other book in any of the world’s religions (Vedas, Bhagavad-Gita, Koran, Book of Mormon, etc.) that contains scientific truth. In fact, they contain statements that are clearly unscientific.


1,286 posted on 09/23/2006 2:45:03 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1282 | View Replies ]


To: presently no screen name

Well said.


1,290 posted on 09/23/2006 2:52:33 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of an American Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies ]

To: presently no screen name

When cutting and pasting the work of others it is polite both to readers and the writer of the original work to provide an acknowledgement of the original source.


1,291 posted on 09/23/2006 2:54:59 PM PDT by Thatcherite (I'm PatHenry I'm the real PatHenry all the other PatHenrys are just imitators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies ]

To: presently no screen name
There is no other book in any of the world’s religions (Vedas, Bhagavad-Gita, Koran, Book of Mormon, etc.) that contains scientific truth. In fact, they contain statements that are clearly unscientific.

Except that Hinduism calculated the age of the earth correctly.

1,293 posted on 09/23/2006 2:56:12 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies ]

To: presently no screen name
With all these truths revealed in Scripture, how could a thinking person deny that the Bible is supernatural in origin? There is no other book in any of the world’s religions (Vedas, Bhagavad-Gita, Koran, Book of Mormon, etc.) that contains scientific truth.

This claim is surprisingly similar to claims made by Muslims about the Qur'an. It should be viewed with suspicion by thinking people. Thinking people look to scripture for answers to questions of morality and purpose. Thinking people look to science books for answer to questions about biology, astronomy, and geology. Thinking people do not look to scientific texts for spiritual advice, and neither do they look to scripture for scientific facts.

1,295 posted on 09/23/2006 3:11:15 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies ]

To: presently no screen name

You seem to have plagiarized your screed from here:

http://www.evidencebible.com/pdf/03_Luke.pdf

Plagiarism exposes FreeRepublic to legal sanctions. I suggest you ask the mods to delete your post before FreeRepublic starts getting letters from lawyers.


1,296 posted on 09/23/2006 3:11:58 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies ]

To: presently no screen name

There appear to be many possible sources for your plagiarized post. This one may be the original.

http://www.livingwaters.com/downloads/Lesson61.pdf

So did you write it or did you plagiarize it?


1,310 posted on 09/23/2006 4:43:22 PM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1286 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson