To: RunningWolf
But then what is science but just the latest greatest (yet limited) explanation of phenomena that will later be found false & yet have a tiny measure of correctness in there somewhere. If Ann Coulter understood that, I would understand your argument. She doesn't. That is only part of her problem with science. The other problem that she has with science, is, well, science. She doesn't understand the most basic of concepts. She should stick with punditry. It's what she's good at.
1,074 posted on
09/22/2006 1:13:37 AM PDT by
wyattearp
(Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
To: wyattearp
Well I think she does very well (I bought her book), but let Ann speak for herself.
But then I will put it this way. The first part is my part and the second is your response to that for which I say she does 'science' one whole h*** of a lot better than several of your own gurus here especially the owner of your ping list who does not does 'science' at all.
W.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson