Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Petrosius

Explain to me the difference here. Is it a difference without a distinction? I don't get the major difference, if there is one. Would appreciate your interpretation:

Transubstantiaion:
1 : an act or instance of transubstantiating or being transubstantiated
2 : the miraculous change by which according to Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox dogma the eucharistic elements at their consecration become the body and blood of Christ while keeping only the appearances of bread and wine

Consubstantiation:
Main Entry: con·sub·stan·ti·a·tion
Function: noun
Pronunciation: "kän(t)-s&b-"stan(t)-she-'A-sh&n
: the actual substantial presence and combination of the body and blood of Christ with the eucharistic bread and wine according to a teaching associated with Martin Luther -- compare


93 posted on 09/15/2006 5:43:42 PM PDT by flaglady47 (Thinking out Loud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: flaglady47
The main difference is that in transubstantiation it is believed that the substance of the bread and wine are actually changed into the substance of the body and blood of our Lord; that only the appearance of bread and wine remain, not their substance. The "trans" in transubstantiation mean beyond the substance.

In consubstantiation it is believed that the substanstance of the bread and wine remain and that our Lord becomes present with the continuing presence of the bread and wine. The "con" in consubstantiation means with the substance.

The Catholic belief in transubstantiation is based on the fact that our Lord said: "This is my body," rather than "Here is my body."

94 posted on 09/15/2006 6:04:57 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson