Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: epow; AppyPappy; Revelation 911; The Grammarian
even though they would thoroughly disapprove of the course the UMC has taken over the last few decades

No, I think they'd approve of what it's done over the last 2 decades. It was the decades from about 40-70's where liberalism took over the church. You know why?

1. People sat on their hands and let "Joe" volunteer to be their representative at meetings and on committees. (Liberals love to occupy positions of influence. "Joe" was oneof those liberals.)

2. They "left" the church to show their disapproval. (Should have stayed to vote the libs out.)

The last 2 decades we've won every single vote at annual conference and have gradually been turning this thing around.

No thanks to those who "cut and run."

37 posted on 06/23/2006 5:28:28 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Supporting our Troops Means Praying for them to Win!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I may be joining the "cut and run" crowd. We seem to be having an issue with a "many paths" message from the pulpit.


38 posted on 06/23/2006 5:32:14 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson