[ScubieNuc]

"The Washington flood was localized."

Out of my whole post, this is all you have to reply? I as much as said that, now, the scientific community accepts it as a HUGE local flood.

My point was that evidence can be ignored or misinterpreted, just like in the "Washington flood." You implied in post #195 that God hid the evidence of a world wide flood. I'm saying that history shows us that the information isn't necessarily hidden, just being ignored or misinterpreted.

Some people want God to be "proven" before they will believe in Him, but to believe in God requires faith, not proof.

Eph 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:

Eph 2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Sincerely

[stands2reason]

HUGE does not equal worldwide.

There are broad areas of the American West that show no signs of flooding in the strata dated at the time the Great Flood was to occur.

[stands2reason]

God cannot be proven.