Replies

Once again you put your foot in your mouth, everything I "cut and pasted" were things I wrote (Didn't we explain this before?).

No. You said you "contribruted" to one of those articles. You did not claim authorship. Now you are claiming you wrote them. Interesting.

If in fact your wrote them as you claim, then this is a vanity thread, it is not? The rules are different in a vanity thread inasmuch as the freeper who posts a vanity thread is open to the same kind of criticism that is allowed against the author of any article that is posted on free republic. Thus we are free to question your motives as well as your credentials.

If in fact you are employed by or associated with Reasons.org, then that would explain your invective towards Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis and the Creation Research Institute as they have been at the forefront in criticizing the positions taken by Reasons.org.

It also would explain why just about everything you post comes directly from that site. It also would explain this little blub in the first paragraph in this thread.

"It's time we [meaning all of us freepers] start telling "Christian" [obviously in quotes because you are inferring that they are not "Christian"] groups like ICR and AIG to stop turning people away from the Bible and tell them to stop their childish, immature attacks on other Christians [inferring that those who doubt the story of creation and the flood are the real and mature "Christians"] (AIG recently refused to be subject to review, now there's the making of a cult!). [inferring that anyone who believes as they do is a cult member]"

I understand now. Thank you. BTW since you are claiming authorship of this article, which author are you?

You can't find anyway to defend your beliefs so you're going to great lengths to fabricate some web of decpetion. I'm not employeed by RTB and in fact, if you go back through my posts, virtually all of my quotes come from Research & Reason. But you're too busy being emotional to figure that out. If you don't want to be involved in this adult conversation, stop wasting everyone's time.

P.S. Let me help you out on your fanciful revision of what I wrote (your bizarre twist in [], my corrections in {}):

"It's time we [meaning all of us freepers] {meaning Christians} start telling "Christian" [obviously in quotes because you are inferring that they are not "Christian"] {obviously in quotes because people at AIG, etc., have a bad habit of unchristian attacks on other believers} groups like ICR and AIG to stop turning people away from the Bible and tell them to stop their childish, immature attacks on other Christians [inferring that those who doubt the story of creation and the flood are the real and mature "Christians"] {inferring that Christians who refer to other Christians as hertics, apostates and compromisers have a long way to go in their Christianity} AIG recently refused to be subject to review, now there's the making of a cult!. [inferring that anyone who believes as they do is a cult member] {inferring that anyone who refuses review, even by like-minded people as AIG did, is heading down an unchristian, unscholarly and dangerous road}"

You've done nothing but put words in my mouth. So again, unless you want to engage in rational discussion, save your personal attacks for someone else.