It appears to me that most of your halfway cogent arguments are simply cut and pasted from Hugh Ross' website. Indeed, it appears that every sentence in this post of yours has been cut and pasted from that site without acknowledgment.
Generally in a debate you use your own words and convey your own thoughts unless you are quoting from a third party source and you give the cite for that quote.
It seems that each time someone brings up a challenging point on this thread, you simply attempt to refute it with some canned answer from reasons.org.
Can you make these same arguments on your own using your own words? The strength of your argument lies in your own ability to defend your position. Pulling canned quotes from unsourced articles simply does not cut it. How abour discussing these issues using your own words?
Once again you put your foot in your mouth, everything I "cut and pasted" were things I wrote (Didn't we explain this before?). You continue to refuse to answer any of my points, which is not suprising. Instead you resort to snide comments and questioning people's honesty. Can you make any arguments that aren't emotional or laced with logical errors?