1 posted on
05/09/2006 4:45:26 PM PDT by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; meandog; gogeo; Lord Washbourne; Calabash; axegrinder; AnalogReigns; Uriah_lost; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar,
Huber and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com More Anglican articles
here.
Humor:
The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
05/09/2006 4:46:16 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi 2006 | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0urs)
To: sionnsar
History will show you that this country would still be practicing slavery had it been left up to religious people. Everything that comes out of this pious hypocrite's mouth is a staggering lie, but this is a real whopper directly contrary to the truth.
3 posted on
05/09/2006 4:51:50 PM PDT by
Argus
To: sionnsar
The Bible is loudly unequivocal when it comes to condemning homosexuality.
These people have to know that but evidently think, probably with good cause, that people won't realize that.
If they want to go head-on against what God says - why don't they stay away from the church instead of trying to integrate and corrupt it?
Keep their life/death style, but don't force into other peoples choice of life style, i.e., following the teachings of the Bible - and demand they negate their own religion by accepting what God rejects.
As I don't foresee God changing His stance on homosexuality anytime soon, why don't the gays form their own religion and stop demanding Christians change theirs. For one thing, it isn't up to Christians or anyone else to change a tenet laid down by God.
5 posted on
05/09/2006 5:42:33 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." LINCOLN)
To: sionnsar
"In this country, unlike some others, we have put together the sacred and secular. Clergy act as agents of the state in solemnizing marriage....In his case, he meant sodomizing marriage.
9 posted on
05/10/2006 6:18:47 AM PDT by
meandog
(If I were to draw the odious Islamic prophet Muhammad, he would have horns, a tail, and a ptichfork!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson