Yes Delphi, you have been forthright in your answers. I'm not sure restornu has. By her quoting of the Bible, it appears that Mormon beliefs fall in line with Christian beliefs, as far as the nature of God and if we can progress to that point goes.
I think that approach is "less than fully honest." You may not agree with me however.
Again, I've said my intention is to point out what I believe the Bible says and show discrepancies with Mormon belief. If that "muddies the waters," then so be it. I think investigators are entitled to the truth - the whole truth. Not just the line-upon-line, precept-upon-precept truth.
i wish you stop trying to impugn my statments
I used the scripture as a witness to what I say!
>>I think investigators are entitled to the truth - the
>>whole truth. Not just the line-upon-line, precept-upon-
>>precept truth.
Well, you are entitled to your opinion, but we do get to the "Whole Truth" as you call it, just not as fast as you would want us to.
My opinion is that to teach you have to start with what people know, then lead them to what they don't, Kind of like paul when he started teaching from the point of the Statue to the "Unknown God", worked for him...
Thank you for the right to disagree :-D
I still like the mental picture of a two month old with a steak, maybe that's just my twisted since of humor.
I gotta go, wifes a callin'
Again, I've said my intention is to point out what I believe the Bible says and show discrepancies with Mormon belief. If that "muddies the waters," then so be it. I think investigators are entitled to the truth - the whole truth. Not just the line-upon-line, precept-upon-precept truth
****
No that is not what muddy the water
it is how the question present in a shock jock matter!
Things of the Spirit need to be witness by the Spirit not spin by the opposition!