Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Diego1618
and the meal being described is simply that....a meal (not a communion)

Your proof of which is nothing but your own wild assertions.

Your Aramaic Bible can say what it wants but The Greek says "on the first of the week."

The Aramaic version of Acts was translated early in the second century AD. Apparently, you believe you today, almost 1900 years later, have a better grip on what "break bread" meant than they did.

This day is never called Sunday anywhere in scripture.....or called...the first day of the week!

The word "Sunday" was not in common useage among Greek and Latin speaking Romans yet at the time Scriptures were written. If you had any familiarity at all with history, you'd be aware of this. But you don't, so you are not.

Again, what day of the week is "The Day of the Lord" if it is not Sunday?

149 posted on 04/11/2006 10:16:41 PM PDT by Calabash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Calabash
and the meal being described is simply that....a meal (not a communion) Your proof of which is nothing but your own wild assertions.

Okay...you prove that it is a communion.

The Aramaic version of Acts was translated early in the second century AD. Apparently, you believe you today, almost 1900 years later, have a better grip on what "break bread" meant than they did.

The Greek version of Acts was written in the first century by Luke and takes preference over your version. Apparently you have never read 2 Peter 2:1. A good example of this is your Aramaic Bible!

Again, what day of the week is "The Day of the Lord" if it is not Sunday?

The day Sunday is not, never has been, or ever will be a Holy Day of God!

151 posted on 04/11/2006 10:30:09 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson