Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: siunevada; Mia T; anymouse; AnnaZ; Humidston; humblegunner; 4CJ; Flyer; Victoria Delsoul; ...
Strategists have been saying for some time that Mrs. Clinton will use her re-election campaign in the heavily Catholic areas of upstate New York as a laboratory for her expected 2008 Presidential bid. “Her spin is, ‘Hey, look, I can win Catholic votes. If I can win the western tier of New York, I can win Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania,’” said veteran Democratic operative Hank Sheinkopf.

Beastwoman-rising ping.

7 posted on 03/31/2006 3:37:15 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
HILLARY DOES JESUS
"FURTHER EVIDENCE WHY SHE IS ONE OF THE MOST DESPICABLE POLITICIANS OUT THERE RIGHT NOW"

by Mia T, 3.26.06



From a Christian (Catholic) theologian:



his is just further evidence of what, in my opinion, is why Hillary Clinton is one of the most despicable politicians that is out there right now in the sense that she's absolutely chameleonlike.

When she is pandering to the Left, she wants nothing to do with religion. She sounds like the ACLU. When she's voting against [the banning of] partial-birth abortion, I don't see her invoking the name of Jesus there because I'm sure she can't picture Jesus doing something like that. And she also knows it doesn't play with her far-left base.

And now she wants to pander to the center, so she starts invoking the name of Jesus.

And as a Christian, I'm offended by her use of Jesus for what I see as her very, very--uh--very self-interested political partisan ambition. I think this is simply a craven attempt to use the name of Jesus for political purposes....

To demonize either side of the immigration issue by invoking the name of Jesus is precisely the point..

This is an issue of prudential judgment that reasonable people can disagree about. They're weighing competing values--humanitarian values vs. values of national sovereignty in the age of terrorism. Neither side of this debate has the moral corner or the moral high ground.

Both sides have good points to make and to demonize the other side by invoking the name of Jesus [is despicable].

Larry Chapp, Ph.D.
Professor of Theology
The O'Reilly Factor

READ MORE

also:
WHY THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT MUST MOBILIZE AGAINST HILLARY:
CLINTON CONFLATES EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND ISLAMO-FASCIST TERRORISTS


AFTERWORD: A note to the Religious Right

13 posted on 03/31/2006 5:21:34 PM PST by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lentulusgracchus

I don't think she'll have any problem getting the votes of the so-called Catholics ala Ted Kennedy and John Kerry. :-)


20 posted on 03/31/2006 8:12:23 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson