Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
Fact is tongues were a sign to the Jew (unbelievers) not believers

Tongues have two uses, one as a sign and the other as a gift. Tongues are a sign to unbelievers, yet 1 Cor 14:26 tells us to bring tongues to a church service. 1 Cor 14:22 he says that prophecy is not for unbelievers but for believers. Yet in 1 Cor 14:23-25, the unbeliever is repulsed by tongues and converted by prophecy. Interesting twist.

49 posted on 03/11/2006 8:43:04 AM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh
Fact is tongues were a sign to the Jew (unbelievers) not believers Tongues have two uses, one as a sign and the other as a gift. Tongues are a sign to unbelievers, yet 1 Cor 14:26 tells us to bring tongues to a church service. 1 Cor 14:22 he says that prophecy is not for unbelievers but for believers. Yet in 1 Cor 14:23-25, the unbeliever is repulsed by tongues and converted by prophecy. Interesting twist.

No, the unbeliever would be unconverted by tongues if he did not understand that particular tongue.

That is why a interpreter was necessary.

However, if an unbeliever came in when prophecy (for the purpose of edification) was going on, he would benefit from that.

Also, tongues were to be given in order, so the unbeliever would not consider the church in a state of confusion.

In conclusion, even when tongues was in operation it was considered the least of all the gifts.

70 posted on 03/12/2006 6:13:23 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson