Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50
By the way, arguing that scholasticism is inferior to monasticism was the backbone of Palamas' victory over Barlaam. Eastern Fathers speak of "experiencing" God and not intellectually understanding Him or, worse, creating a partnership of sorts. Barlaam was a poor defender of Scholasticism. He was a Platonic humanist, an inferior version of St. Thomas Aquinas' school of thought. Experiencing God in contemplative prayer, knowing the unknoweable, is contact with God Himself, not just with a Hypostatis.

Regards

7,564 posted on 06/01/2006 4:24:21 PM PDT by jo kus (There is nothing colder than a Christian who doesn't care for the salvation of others - St.Crysostom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7553 | View Replies ]


To: jo kus
Experiencing God in contemplative prayer, knowing the unknoweable, is contact with God Himself, not just with a Hypostatis

The Eastern Fathers would disagree. We experience God's uncreated energies, the uncreated Light of Tabor, not God's Essence. We are in His presence all the time, jo. His nature is beyond our reach.

7,566 posted on 06/01/2006 4:32:36 PM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7564 | View Replies ]

To: jo kus; kosta50
Experiencing God in contemplative prayer, knowing the unknoweable, is contact with God Himself, not just with a Hypostatis.

It seems to me there is a contradiction in that statement. To speak of "God Himself" is to acknowledge God as Person and to affirm God as hypostasis. Personal pronouns require a person. So I am not sure what you are trying to say.

7,567 posted on 06/01/2006 4:47:04 PM PDT by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7564 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson