Neither of those books were disputed.
There is no transcription error, the blood is in Col.1:14.
If multiple authorship is possible, then transcription error is not impossible.
No one disputes the authorship that Paul wrote both books.
You aptly observe that in this case the theology is the same, i.e. unaffected by the addition (because the concepts contained in these verses are reinforced elsewhere), the very existence of such discrepancies shows human corruption of Scripture
No, without blood the verse is in error and there cannot be errors in the Bible text, if it is to be considered the Bible.
Yes they are.
There is no transcription error, the blood is in Col.1:14
Not in most Greek sources.
No, without blood the verse is in error and there cannot be errors in the Bible text, if it is to be considered the Bible
Well, I got news for you: try reading more than one version of the dozens and dozens of redacted and edited versions of the Bible and you would be amazed what's in them or what's not in them all!
Or you can just stay where you are. There is some comfort in denial. BTW, shhh, the earth is really not flat.