Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Full Court

I watch you doing this stupid trick for an umpteen time in amazement.

Stubbornly, you quote Matthew 1:25 which does not say anything about Joseph and Mary after the birth of Jesus. Then you are, of course, challenged on it. Then you produce a proof of something that no one is disputing, that to "know" is indeed an euphemism for sexual relation.

Then you repeat that stupidity of yours time after time. Relax. You don;'t understand the scripture. Find some other occupation (knitting?). Seriously.


6,695 posted on 05/15/2006 8:52:15 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6692 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

Just face the fact, Mary was a sexual being, just like most married women.


6,696 posted on 05/15/2006 8:54:56 PM PDT by Full Court (click on my name to see the baby!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6695 | View Replies ]

To: Full Court; annalex; Dr. Eckleburg
Alex: "Then you repeat that stupidity of yours time after time. Relax. You don;'t understand the scripture. Find some other occupation (knitting?). Seriously."

Full Court, whenever I read statements from Alex like this, which is very often recently, I always tell myself the same thing: "This is the witness of Catholicism." That really helps me put everything into perspective. :)

6,880 posted on 05/19/2006 1:09:34 AM PDT by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6695 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson