Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50

To be clear so we can all understand just what you're speculating about the apostle Paul, are any of his beliefs POST-conversion thought by you to be "gnostic?"

Or just some of his PRE-conversion beliefs when he was universally-recognized to be a chief tormentor of Christians?


6,559 posted on 05/13/2006 11:47:54 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6558 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Eckleburg
are any of his beliefs POST-conversion thought by you to be "gnostic?"

It is thought so by some highly educated people. You will have to do your own research on this. But to answer your question: his earlier Epistles contain many Gnostic words and phrases. His later works don't but are probably forgeries. Fingers point at +Irenaeus.

One thing you will have to understand is that the Church needed a way out, because it was dying quickly in Israel. +Peter came back from preaching to the Jews, which was a complete failure. Even basic knowledge of Judaism would make you understand why (for starters, Jews do not believe man needs grace to be righteous).

It was +Paul who had the flexibility needed to make Christianity acceptable to Gentiles. He even reprimanded +Peter publicly for his resistance to change Judaic practices or to eat with Gentiles. Without +Paul, Christianity would bee a dead religion.

6,586 posted on 05/13/2006 9:45:49 PM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6559 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson